🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and platforms are "robbing our children's childhood". A law could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to pass a bill lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," stated the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong data".

Last year, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and fit for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is mostly happening at the regional level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various politicians to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations take a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this international conversation continues, the steps of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.