🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.